Will those who make money from false accusations escape justice?
Many immediately reported that Arnold van den Berg, the Jewish notary recently accused of defrauding Anne Frank, had no character, track record, information, motives, or a world-renowned diarist in this new, vulnerable book. There was no way to cheat. accused of promoting it.
Just days after the book’s ban was lifted by the editors and “research team”, knowledgeable Dutch Jews and respected Dutch historians, without exceptionShe trampled on shocking but unfounded findings. It was considered shabby, amateurish, unscientific and, in short, a bunch of nonsense. I blogged extensively and immediately in English, without success.
Other early appeals from the American publisher were also ignored. Even a first petition to the European Jewish Congress fell on deaf ears. A few months later, Dutch historians specializing in the Holocaust and World War II published a book detailing all the errors. This denial was reason enough for the Dutch publisher to recall the malicious book. But historians’ disapproval of the 69-page English translation had no impact on the many foreign-language publishers and YouTube publishers who still monetize that notoriety today. Several times I have reported these clips to YouTube which have been viewed millions of times but have kept them going. heroine ultimately There’s the outrageous book on sale (60% off) but it’s still selling.
Now a new, most profound denial of all time has appeared in English, going through every flawed detail, and Algemeiner has reported on it. Everyone apologizes for not knowing that this baseless slander is dead now.
How then dare English, Spanish, German and other publishers to spread this defamation about a dead Jew who cannot defend himself? He was, if anything, a decent man through and through, if not an authoritative war hero then a dignitary who had protected the many Jewish victims of the Nazis in hiding. couldn’t go.
I kinda wish that the surviving relatives of those wrongly accused would have emotional and financial support to go after the pants of those who made money from this humiliation. I don’t mean to be angry with anyone but just for the sake of justice let’s fix this wrong. It takes a lot of publicity to undo all the unwanted bad press this great Jew has received 70 years after his death. But the test is also a warning to fellow hobbyists on any subject, to make sure they know what they’re talking about before they smear someone’s name because it’s going to sell like hotcakes.
However, I’m not sure if the self-appointed judges at this kangaroo court were malicious at any point. We’ve seen it before: amateurs who were overly critical and exhaustive in rejecting scientific research, but then forgot to dissect their own trivial theory, and then had nothing to show. Were too stubborn to admit not being there.
These “researchers” took a desperate leap to a theory after spending much time and money with no result, but after many dead ends, neither of them properly reasoned nor investigated. I don’t think his goal was fame or money at any point. Rather, they could not draw the logical conclusion from human weakness and dilettantism that everything was a waste of effort, time and money, but they found nothing. This is the livelihood of scientists. If a historian had been inclined to join them, he could have told them so, though others might have downplayed him; The most likely reason why none of the historians wanted to work with him.
While the amateur detractors had slightly twisted the facts and exaggerated their thoroughness and expertise, I’m not sure this was to the extent that it could be called fraudulent and fraudulent.
A prolific and creative writer and thinker, MM is a near-daily blog contributor to the Times of Israel, and was previously known for decades as a frequent letter writer to Jerusalem Post readers. He often makes his readers laugh, drive them crazy, or think he’s crazy – near-perfect blogging. He is proud that his analytically brief comments have been removed from both left and right news sites. * As a marginal thinker, he sees things that are not yet many. He’s half a prophet. half. Let’s not exaggerate. He doesn’t believe that people see and think in a vacuum. So he wanted a comprehensive biography where interested readers can trace a little of what background, experience, and education contribute to his vision. * To find less recent posts about XXX from over 1600 of his archived posts, go to the top right corner of the Times of Israel page, click the search icon and search for “Zuiden, XXX”. Another, more in-depth blog to subscribe to is here: * Like most of his readers, he believes in being kind, respectful, and loyal. However, if you think these are their top priorities, you may be disappointed. His first loyalty is to the truth. He will try to stay within the bounds of democratic and Jewish law, but he will not lie to support opinions or people who do not deserve it. He admits that he sometimes exaggerates to say something that can make him feel guilty, when in fact he’s a nice person to talk to. He believes – like Dutch – that a strong opinion does not imply intolerance of other views. * It is sometimes misunderstood because its wide and varied field of vision rarely fits into the box of an expert. But that’s exactly what you love about him. He has written extensively on psychology (including sexuality and abuse), medicine (including physical immortality), science (including basic statistics), politics (Israel, America and the Netherlands, activism), oppression and liberation (intersection, for the youth). Is. Humans, Elderly, Non-Whites, Women, Laborers, Jews, LGBTQIA+, Foreigners and Everyone Else Who Is Being Dehumanized or Exploited), Integrity, Philosophy, Jews (Judaism, Judaism, Holocaust and Jewish Liberation), Climate Crisis, Ecology and Vegetarianism , matters from the news or the Torah portion of the week, or new insights that suddenly appeared to him. * His most influential teachers are (chronologically) his parents, Niko (Nathan) van Zuiden and Betty (Bise) Nieweg, Wim Kahn, Mozart, Harvey Jackins, Marshall Rosenberg, Reb Schlomo Karlbach and Lehdil Been Chaim Lechheim, Rabbi Dr. Natan Lopez Cardozo, Rao Zeve Lef and Rao Mir Lubin. * One of his rabbis called him Mr. Innovation [Ish haChidushim], Yet their originality is deeply rooted in traditional Judaism, although they can veer in unexpected directions. In fact, he claims he’s not modernizing anything. Instead, relying primarily on the original Hebrew Torah text, he seeks to rediscover classical Jewish thought that had all but been lost in thousands of years of gentile rule and Jewish assimilation. (He advocates reading the Torah more closely to see what it would mean and before hitting on the comments.) This in all aspects of life, but mostly men in the areas of free will, activism, homosexuality and salvation. * She hopes her words will inspire and inform, and comfort and solace to those afflicted. He aims to bring in a fresh perspective rather than harping on the clear and familiar. He enjoys writing encyclopedic reviews. He doesn’t expect his readers to agree with him. Rather, the original heads should be disputed. In short, his main political positions include: anti-Trumpism, anti-elitism, anti-radicalism and supremacy, Zionism, for anti-dissent and non-violence, against those who abuse democratic freedoms, for the sham ME peace process. . For the original, conservative, pro-scientist, pro-free will, anti-blame-the-victim and down-to-earth, classic optimism and happiness. * He is an embryonic pharmaceutical industry survivor (born in 1953 to parents who were Dutch-Jewish Holocaust survivors who met in the Netherlands’ largest concentration camp, Westerbork. He was a humble listener. It was decades before he speaker too. Bullies and scammers envy and hate him almost immediately.* He has a BA in Medicine (University of Amsterdam) – is half a doctor. He has been practicing co-counselling for reparation since 1977, now not a key teacher and a kind, energetic doctor. He became a social worker, became religious, made aliyah and raised three wonderful children non-violently. For a number of years he became a member of the Dutch-speaking public. He was active in Hasbara. He wrote an unpublished tome on Jewish free will. He has been since 2008 strict vegetarian. He is an orthodox Jew, but not a rabbi. He lives in Jerusalem with his library. Fr feel free to tell him. Generation) Holocaust survivor Al Lowance from the Netherlands. From the age of 38 his dream was to do something different by teaching through writing. He got 9 out of 10 for Dutch three times in his high school diploma but spends his days communicating in English and Hebrew – how ironic. Must have a good sense of humor in G‑d. In case you’re wondering – yes, he’s a bit whiny. If you’re a native English speaker and wondering why you should learn from people whose English is only their second language, consider the benefits of taking a native-speaker look beyond your cultural bubble.